• The reviewer is responsible for evaluating a paper in their specialty field and honest feedback to authors about their submission. 
• It is suitable for the reviewer to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article, ways to improve the quality of the work and evaluate the uniqueness of the manuscript.

If you accept a paper that covers a topic that is not your research area of expertise, please notify the chief editor as soon as possible. Please feel free to recommend another reviewer.

Reviewing process is confidential duty and please do not discuss any part of the submissions with a third party. Please do not contact the author directly.

When reviewing the article, if you have any query please visit the Journal template.

• Perspectives
• Original Research
• Review Article
• Case studies
• Viewpoints
• Interviews
• Book Reviews
• Product Reviews

If you are doubtful that an article is a substantial copy of another research, please let the editor know, citing the previous work in as much detail as possible.

Please complete the “Reviewer’s Comments Form”. Never hesitate to contact the editorial office with any questions you may have.